> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://skamania-dispatch.ghost.io/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# ⚡ Special Report: Klickitat County’s Solar & Battery Storage Ordinance
- URL: https://skamania-dispatch.ghost.io/special-report-klickitat-countys-solar-battery-storage-ordinance/
- Published: 2025-11-15T01:06:28.000Z
- Updated: 2025-11-15T01:06:28.000Z
- Description: A major BESS and solar ordinance is nearing a vote in Klickitat County. Supporters see grid reliability and renewable-energy benefits; neighbors and tribes are raising safety, farmland, and scenic-area concerns. Here’s what’s at stake, and why Skamania should watch too.
- Author: Dispatch Squatch
- Tags: Klickitat County, Klickitat County Planning Commission, Skamania County

**For both residents of both Klickitat and Skamania County, this emerging Battery Energy Storage System ordinance in Klickitat is worth keeping an eye on.** This special report will give you an introduction to what's on the table.

When one Gorge county adopts strong or weak standards, **projects and developers tend to shift regionally**. And because Washington allows major energy projects to bypass local rules through the EFSEC ([Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council](https://efsec.wa.gov/?ref=skamania-dispatch.ghost.io)) process, both counties benefit from having clear, well-designed local standards. So, let's get into it!

tl;dr: **Klickitat is writing the first Gorge-side playbook on how rural counties here may handle utility-scale battery storage. Skamania may face similar proposals in the next few years.**

---

# 🔋 **What Is a BESS? A Quick Guide for Neighbors**

A **Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)** stores excess renewable energy, mainly solar and wind, and releases it back to the grid when demand is high. Think of it as a giant, industrial-scale rechargeable battery. They can help:

- prevent blackouts,
- balance the electric grid,
- support clean-energy expansion, and
- store energy for use during evenings or extreme weather.

They’re widely used in the Southwest, California, Texas, and increasingly throughout the Pacific Northwest.

![A large utility-scale battery energy storage facility sits on a cleared, gravel-covered site in a rural landscape. Dozens of long, white container-like battery units are arranged in neat parallel rows, each connected by electrical equipment and fenced for security. Power lines and a large substation stretch across the background, with farmland and low hills visible under a golden sky.](https://storage.ghost.io/c/08/d4/08d4e738-cf74-4996-a367-55dfa5ad19c9/content/images/2025/11/2023-06-14-rwe-connects-its-first-utility-scale-battery-storage-project-to-the-california-grid.jpg)

An example of a BESS, the ****Fifth Standard battery storage facility** in Fresno, California. Sizes and layouts of these facilities vary by project.

---

# ⚠️ **Why Are These Projects Debated?**

### ⚡ **Benefits to Consider:**

Klickitat county sits on major BPA transmission corridors, making it one of the most cost-efficient places in the region to connect large-scale energy projects. BESS facilities help utilities store excess solar power during the day and release it in the evening when demand spikes, improving overall grid stability.

For local communities, a well-designed BESS can:

- **Strengthen grid reliability** during windstorms, fires, heat waves, and outages
- **Improve emergency resilience** by stabilizing voltage and reducing blackouts
- **Reduce dependence on gas “peaker plants”** by shifting renewable energy into peak-use hours
- **Support future industrial loads** without new fossil-fuel generation
- **Generate tax revenue** through property taxes, impact fees, or negotiated benefit agreements
- **Create short-term construction jobs** and ongoing maintenance work

But the benefits depend heavily on **how the county regulates siting, safety, environmental impacts, public engagement, and fiscal agreements.** This is why the new Solar & BESS ordinance has become such a focal point of local debate.

### ⚡ Carefully Assessing Risks:

Across the country, communities are also asking questions about:

- **Safety**
  - Lithium-ion systems are generally safe, but can fail in rare cases through “thermal runaway” fires, which require special firefighting equipment and hazmat protocols.
- **Farmland & Rural Character**
  - Some communities express concerns about loss of agricultural land, visual impacts, fencing, glare, and large construction footprints.
- **Local Control vs. State Preemption**
  - In Washington, if a local ordinance is too strict, or doesn’t exist, developers can bypass counties via **EFSEC**, the state’s siting authority. **Counties want rules strong enough to protect neighbors, but not so restrictive that they lose jurisdiction entirely.**
- **Environmental & Scenic Impacts**
  - Impacts to wildlife, soil, dust, stormwater, and the Gorge’s scenic viewshed.

---

# 🏜 **What Klickitat County Is Proposing**

Klickitat placed a temporary moratorium on battery storage projects in 2024 and formed a **22-member Project Advisory Committee (PAC)** in early 2025 to create a full ordinance. The draft ordinance includes:

### **Required setbacks and buffers**

Including debated distances between facilities and homes.

### **A mandatory neighborhood meeting before an application is submitted**

This is intended to create early transparency and accountability.

### **Nine required technical reports**, including:

- fiscal impact analysis
- fire-safety plan
- visual impact analysis
- agricultural mitigation plan
- community involvement report
- dual-use/agrivoltaics evaluation
- decommissioning and recycling plan

### **Screening, lighting, and landscaping standards**

To reduce visual impact and improve safety.

### **Noise, stormwater, and vegetation rules**

Including limitations on combustible materials around battery units.

### **Amending the Energy Overlay Zone**

Solar projects would no longer be allowed “by right” and must undergo a conditional-use permit process with more detailed review.

### **Environmental review through SEPA**

The draft SEPA questionnaire will be updated following public comment and Planning Commission deliberations.

---

# 🧭 **Where the Debate Stands Now**

The Planning Commission is in the final stage of deliberations. Public testimony is closed, but written comments are still read. Themes emerging from recent hearings (as conveyed in the [Staff Report](https://www.klickitatcounty.gov/DocumentCenter/View/21883/Staff-Report-Solar-BESS-Ord-for-PC-hearing-9-15-2025?ref=skamania-dispatch.ghost.io)):

- **Residents & Tribes** \- strong support for safety, scenic protection, agricultural preservation, and early public involvement.
- **Developers (solar, battery, hydrogen)** \- concern that the ordinance may be more restrictive than surrounding counties, incentivizing developers to apply through EFSEC instead of local permitting.
- **County departments** \- Emergency Management emphasized safety protocols, and Economic Development commented on fiscal reporting.

---

## 📄 **What Happened at the Sept. 15 Planning Commission Hearing?**

*(Documented by* [*Documenters.org*](https://www.documenters.org/assignments/regular-meeting-16441/report/?ref=skamania-dispatch.ghost.io) *\- CC-BY-4.0)*

At this key hearing, Planning Commissioners and staff walked through the [**Draft Industrial-Scale Solar & BESS Ordinance**](https://www.klickitatcounty.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22112/SOLAR-ORDINANCE-PAC-approved-w-PC-V9-web-2025-11-10?bidId=&ref=skamania-dispatch.ghost.io) section-by-section, focusing on:

### **1\. Applicability & Zoning**

- Clarifying that **all utility-scale BESS** (standalone or paired with solar) would require a **Conditional Use Permit**.
- Confirming that solar is allowed only in **General Rural, Open Space, Extensive Agriculture, and Rural Residential-2**, and prohibited in the **Gorge National Scenic Area viewshed**.

### **2\. Setbacks & Separation**

- Ongoing debate about the **5,280-foot (1-mile)** visual setback from any residential property.
- Commissioners revisited minimum **100-ft property-line setbacks**, fire-protection buffers, and vegetation-clearance rules.

### **3\. Fire & Safety Requirements**

- Discussion of the **Safety Feasibility Assessment Report**:
  - thermal-runaway risk planning
  - emergency-access standards
  - radio-interference mitigation
  - detailed Emergency Operations Plan
- First-responder training responsibilities were emphasized.

### **4\. Agriculture & Agrivoltaics**

- Commissioners reviewed requirements for:
  - **Agricultural Land Mitigation Reports**
  - dual-use grazing/crop production
  - soil protection and water-management standards
  - limits on impervious surface area (20% cap)

### **5\. Visual Impacts**

- Visual-impact modeling, screening, landscaping plans, and **“before/after” simulations** were covered.
- Particular attention was given to protecting travel corridors and rural character.

### **6\. Fiscal & Economic Reporting**

- The Commission reviewed requirements for the **Fiscal Analysis Report**, including:
  - job creation
  - impacts on county services
  - tax revenue projections
  - real-estate impact studies
  - community benefit agreements

### **7\. Community Engagement**

- Residents and tribes must be notified early.
- Projects require at least **one pre-application neighborhood meeting** with a county planner present.
- Developers must submit a **Community Engagement Results Report** explaining how they addressed concerns.

### **8\. Developer Comments**

- Industry representatives raised concerns about:
  - the one-mile setback
  - numerous required reports
  - agrivoltaic feasibility
  - potential for projects to route through **EFSEC** instead of local permitting if the ordinance becomes too strict.

---

# 🗳 **How to Participate**

### **Next Meeting:**

**Planning Commission - Monday, Nov. 17, 6:00 PM**  
Klickitat County Services Building (Room 200), Goldendale  
**Zoom:** Meeting ID [857 8237 2047](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85782372047?pwd%3DWcV8P4l5C1aTxaO71ZIpRJW7NaCsNb.1&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1710350206445383&usg=AOvVaw2eEtFK97dc8fG3850VXCyc) | Passcode 152082

Public comment is closed for this hearing, but written comments may still be submitted:

📬 **planning@klickitatcounty.org**  
📬 [**bocc@klickitatcounty.org**](mailto:bocc@klickitatcounty.org)

---

# 🌄 **Why Skamania Should Watch Too**

- Skamania shares the same BPA transmission corridors that attract large-scale energy projects.
- BESS facilities can be built without large solar farms, making steep or fragmented terrain, or the minimal amount of buildable land across the county in general, less of a barrier.
- EFSEC preemption applies equally in Skamania, meaning state-approved energy projects can bypass local zoning.
- Skamania will begin its own **GMA update** soon, including potential energy-facility considerations.
- Fire districts, planners, and the public benefit from advance awareness of BESS safety, training, and land-use implications.
- Developers often “county-shop” based on which county has clearer or more permissive ordinances.

**What Klickitat decides today may shape what Skamania encounters tomorrow.** We hope this has helped catch you up on what BESS is, and what that may mean for Gorge Residents in the years to come.